Abstract:
Agriculture markets are old and complex in structures existing across many parts of the
India. The locality of such markets has formed a dense site for economic, political and
social activity connecting towns and local agricultural markets to much bigger hub of
commerce and consumption. These agricultural markets as the ‘first crucial transaction’
between the producer and the buyer that has been widely portrayed as oligopolistic,
entrenched, with a wide gap between what the farmers get paid for their produce and
the prices at which the consumers buy. The APMC markets and LAMPS Cooperative
as a marketplace were introduced to protect the farmers from the whims of traders who
routinely exploited through unfair prices and terms. There has been increasing demands
for dismantling of the mandi system and strengthening of cooperatives in the tribal
context and as a key to liberalisation.
Drawing on a fieldwork conducted in 2019 in Mandla district of Madhya Pradesh, this
thesis centres on everyday life of a tribal, medium of livelihood, and relationship with
the agricultural markets in the central Indian state. It discovers the complex and
dynamic natures of marketplace relation to the production structure. Furthermore, it
shows the culture of tribal and their closeness with the nature, regional context with the
choices and constraints of small and marginal farmers, and processes of reform. This
thesis is an attempt to form an integrated view of agricultural markets. Part One of the
analysis follows the Krishi Upaj Mandi of Mandla District as a major state led
intervention, which is set up in the local context of the tribal area and agricultural
production, producing a variety of effects on the mandi due to the spatial variations,
range of intermediaries, structures, social relation among the mandi actors and the
domestic policies that are experienced in the market yard. Part Two dives into the
regional context of the commodity markets for paddy, one of the major produced crops
in Madhya Pradesh. The analysis traces the livelihood options available with the tribal,
land condition, credit availability and farmers’ preferred market. It deals with bigger
and more complex problems of the tribal society that highlights the lack of empirical
evidence in the formation of policies ignoring the range of social, cultural and rural
factors. It raises serious questions to local actors and importantly to more distant
policymakers.